Introduction
The appeal was filed against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which stated that the High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain a petition against the Returning Officer’s improper rejection of a nomination under Article 226.
Brief Facts
The appellant submitted nomination papers for the Madras Legislative Assembly election from the Namakkal Constituency in Salem District. On 28th November 1951, the Returning Officer scrutinized the nomination papers of various candidates and rejected the appellant’s nomination paper on specific grounds. Subsequently, the appellant approached the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of certiorari to annul the Returning Officer’s decision and include the appellant’s name in the list of valid nominations.
The High Court dismissed the application, citing lack of jurisdiction due to Article 329(b) of the Constitution. In this appeal, the appellant contends that the High Court’s view is incorrect and that Article 329(b) does not affect the High Court’s jurisdiction in this instance.
The arguments challenging the High Court’s judgment included: 1) the discrepancy between the language of Article 329(b) itself or in conjunction with Part XV of the Constitution; and 2) potential anomalies arising from the High Court’s interpretation of Article 329(2).
The arguments supporting this interpretation were:
- “Election” in Article 329(2) refers to the polling result and final candidate selection.
- An election petition can only be filed post-declaration of polling results or election completion.
- Differences in language usage in Articles 324(1), 327, and 328 indicate distinct references to matters before and after polling results.
- The Returning Officer’s action in rejecting a nomination paper falls under Article 226 due to provisions in Section 36 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, subject to Article 327.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the appeal.
Question: Does the electoral law in India contemplate two avenues for challenging matters related to election proceedings – one during the process via the High Court’s extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 (with the ordinary court jurisdiction expressly excluded), and another post-completion through an election petition?
Court Analysis and Decision:
The Court analyzed the case referencing page 600 of the judgment in Sarvothama Rao v/s Municipal Council. The observations made regarding elections to Local Boards are applicable to legislative elections, emphasizing that in a democratic constitution, protracted or obstructed elections could lead to serious consequences. In England, Parliament has not provided immediate relief to aggrieved candidates, who must wait until after the election to challenge nomination paper rejections. The Court concluded that if the High Court’s interpretation of Article 329(b) is correct, concerns about hardship and inconvenience become irrelevant. The Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal.
A landmark Supreme Court ruling clarifies jurisdiction limits on election disputes, asserting High Courts can’t intervene under Article 226 during the election process. 🏛️⚖️ A pivotal decision safeguarding the electoral process’s integrity and ensuring disputes wait until post-election. #SupremeCourtVerdict #ElectionLaw
I came across your site wanting to learn more and you did not disappoint. Keep up the terrific work, and just so you know, I have bookmarked your page to stay in the loop of your future posts. Here is mine at QU9 about Membership Websites. Have a wonderful day!
Hey! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO?
I’m trying to get my website to rank for some targeted keywords but
I’m not seeing very good success. If you know of any please share.
Thank you! You can read similar blog here: Wool product
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.
I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
Hello there! Do you know if they make any plugins
to assist with Search Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to
rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very
good results. If you know of any please share. Many thanks!
I saw similar article here: Your destiny
I’m really impressed along with your writing talents and also with the structure on your blog. Is this a paid subject or did you customize it yourself? Anyway stay up the nice quality writing, it is uncommon to look a great weblog like this one these days. I like unfoldlaw.in ! Mine is: Snipfeed
I’m extremely inspired with your writing skills and also with the format to your blog. Is this a paid subject or did you customize it your self? Anyway keep up the excellent high quality writing, it is rare to see a nice blog like this one today. I like unfoldlaw.in ! I made: Lemlist
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me.